CD-Adapco

UK MoD Defends Its Snatch Land Rovers

Related Stories: Britain/U.K., Issues - Political, Policy - Procurement, Trucks & Transport

IDGA Software Radio
Advertisement
Snatch Vixen
Snatch Vixen
(click to view full)

UK SAS Commander Quits, Citing Inadequate Equipment” placed the UK’s Snatch Land Rovers at the center of a series of controversies and senior resignations over the vehicle’s lack of protection. To date, 37 British troops have been killed in Land Rover Snatch vehicles while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan – 1/8 of all British casualties in those theaters.

DID’s article detailed Britain’s purchases of up-armored and all-terrain vehicles to supplement the Snatch, including a recent GBP 700 million order for various supply and specialty vehicles like the Buffalo and Wolfhound mine-protected vehicles, Navistar’s Husky TSV, and the Coyote TSV to accompany Supacat’s off-road Jackal wheeled vehicles. The MoD has also been forced to publicly address the Snatch furor on its blog, where it said that:

“An article in the Daily Telegraph claims that the deaths of hundreds of soldiers are linked to Snatch Land Rover vehicles in Afghanistan and Iraq. We take the protection of our troops very seriously, but operations are inherently risky. We take the steps we can to minimise the risks whilst remembering that we must achieve the tasks required…. If there was a better vehicle, a smaller vehicle, out there that we could get our hands on quickly, or could have got our hands on quickly, we would do so or would have done so. We have been going round the international market trying to see if there is another smaller vehicle – it doesn’t exist. We are spending over [GBP] 30million to upgrade all our Snatch vehicles on operations to Snatch Vixen, which provides the same level of manoeuvrability with increased protection. These modifications will give the Snatch Vixen the highest levels of protection for its size and weight class, compared to other vehicles out there on the market.”

Read “UK SAS Commander Quits, Citing Inadequate Equipment” for ongoing updates.

Images on Defense Industry Daily

Defense Industry Daily does not own the rights to the images displayed on our site. We use images under "fair use" copyright doctrine, from public sources and private organizations, or use images under Creative Commons/ GNU licenses that make them available to the general public, or with explicit and noted permission. All rights remain with the original image owners.

If you believe that a DID image may violate these conditions, please discuss it with us via an email to editorial@defenseindustrydaily.com

The sizes displayed on DID are the only sizes we have to offer.


Close