BIP Solutions - Click Here!

Dispatches from Afghanistan: Armored vs. Blast Resistant

Related Stories: Americas - Other, Asia - Central, BAE, Field Reports, Think Tanks, Trucks & Transport, Warfare - Lessons, Warfare - Trends

Advertisement
LAND_RG-31_USMC_IEDed.jpg
USMC RG-31, IEDed in Iraq
(click to view full)

Canadian military think tank CASR notes that:

“On 26 September 2006, a suicide bomber attacked a Canadian convoy 2km from Kandahar Airfield. The bomber detonated a explosives-laden minivan while trying to ram an RG-31 Nyala Armoured Patrol Vehicle. The result differed dramatically from earlier attacks on armoured [Mercedes] G-wagons. Instead of charred wreckage, the blast- resistant [BAE Systems OMC] Nyala limped home with little damage. Instead of wounded or dead, no-one was injured inside the APV.”

See the full CP article describing this situation (only available here thanks to a canoe.ca technical glitch), and note the Canadian troops’ contrasting lack of confidence in their up-armored Mercedes G-Wagens; DID has covered both this specific problem, and the larger global trend of which it’s a part.

CASR’s “Blast-Resistant Vehicles For Beginners” offers contrasting pictures from Afghanistan and explains the basics re: how to make vehicles mine-resistant… something that isn’t the same as up-armoring them. See also Part 2: Tracing the Origins | Part 3: Tweaking the APV | Part 4: The Hybrids | Part 5: Applique or ‘Add-on’ Armour and the Case for Blast-Resistant Support.

In addition to V-hull designs like BAE OMC’s RG-31 Nyala featured in this story, Force Protection’s Cougar, ADI’s Bushmaster, et. al., DID has also covered alternative/additional options like the KMW Dingo 2’s composite blast pan, the Iveco Panther CLV’s collapsible layered approach, et. al. It’s a topic that looms large as the USA considers what will come next after contracts for its Hummers, FMTV medium trucks, and HEMTT heavy trucks end during the FY 2007-2008 time frame.

Images on Defense Industry Daily

Defense Industry Daily does not own the rights to the images displayed on our site. We use images under "fair use" copyright doctrine, from public sources and private organizations, or use images under Creative Commons/ GNU licenses that make them available to the general public, or with explicit and noted permission. All rights remain with the original image owners.

If you believe that a DID image may violate these conditions, please discuss it with us via an email to editorial@defenseindustrydaily.com

The sizes displayed on DID are the only sizes we have to offer.


Close