This article is included in these additional categories: Fighters & Attack | Heavy Bombers | Issues - Political | Lockheed Martin | Missiles - Precision Attack | New Systems Tech | Project Failures | Testing & Evaluation | USA
JASSM/ No Ma’am – Which Will It Be?
For more on this and other stories, please consider purchasing a membership.
If you are already a subscriber, login to your account.
If you are already a subscriber, login to your account.
JASSM with F-16(click to view full) The US Defense Budget has gone to “reconciliation,” during which the US Congress and Senate attempt to take the different defense budgets passed in each body, and reconcile them into one official document for the President to sign. The Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) is left in limbo during this time, either to be cut almost entirely with a recommendation for termination, or to face a $50 million trim from its $150 million program request. What would be lost if the program were canceled? And why do members of the House and Senate want the program cut or reined in? Lockheed Martin’s AGM-158 JASSM is intended to be an inexpensive powered cruise missile, as opposed to the unpowered but similar-looking AGM-154 JSOW glide bomb. Whereas JSOWs have a 15-40 nautical mile range, JASSM would deliver its 1,000-lb. warhead about 200 nautical miles from the launch aircraft using GPS/INS guidance and an infrared terminal seeker. This capability would be a significant help against heavily defended targets, as a JASSM is both cheaper and stealthier than a B-52 bomber or even an F-16. It’s also cheaper than other missile alternatives, the AGM-68C/D CALCM air-launched Tomahawk and […]
One Source: Hundreds of programs; Thousands of links, photos, and analyses
DII brings a complete collection of articles with original reporting and research, and expert analyses of events to your desktop – no need for multiple modules, or complex subscriptions. All supporting documents, links, & appendices accompany each article.
Benefits
- Save time
- Eliminate your blind spots
- Get the big picture, quickly
- Keep up with the important facts
- Stay on top of your projects or your competitors
Features
- Coverage of procurement and doctrine issues
- Timeline of past and future program events
- Comprehensive links to other useful resources
Monthly
$59.95/Per Month
- Charged Monthly
- 1 User
Quarterly
$50/Per Month
- $150 Charged Each Quarter
- 1 User
Yearly
$45/Per Month
- $540 charged each year
- 1 User
2 years
$35/Per Month
- $840 Charged every other year
- 1 User