Iron Key - Click Here!

South Korea to Buy Another 20 F-15K Fighters?

Related Stories: Americas - USA, Asia - Other, Boeing, Contracts - Intent, Engines - Aircraft, Fighters & Attack, Issues - Political, Radars

Advertisement
ORD_SLAM-ER_on_F-15_Strike_Eagle.jpg
Strike Eagle w. SLAM-ERs
(click to view full)

Back in 2002, the Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) selected the F-15K advanced derivative of the F-15E Strike Eagle for its Next Generation Fighter Program. Under that $3.6 billion contract, Boeing will deliver 40 aircraft to the ROKAF beginning this year and ending in August 2008. South Korea’s 2-seat F-15K Strike Eagles will be the first F-15s produced with the GE F110 engine common on many US F-16C/D aircraft, and will also carry the SLAM-ER missile as their medium-range precision strike weapon. They will not be equipped with the AESA radars found on some US F-15Cs and Singapore’s forthcoming F-15SGs, however, relying instead on the standard AN/APG-63(v1) radars that equip most Strike Eagles in service around the world. See this RealVideo clip of the first F-15K in flight.

In May 2006, the Korean Overseas Information Service said that the ROKAF would purchase another 20 F-15K multi-role aircraft beginning in 2009 – but that report has since been qualified, and a subsequent report says that South Korea may be examining the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter instead. What’s going on? DID may be able to clarify…

AIR_F-35A_JSF_Head-On.jpg
F-35A head-on
(click to view full)

According to the Korean Overseas Information Service’s November 1, 2006 report, “a winning model has not been decided yet” in the F-X Phase 2 program to secure an additional 20 “F-15 fighter-level” jets at a cost of 2.3 trillion won ($2.3 billion) “to strengthen [South Korea’s] air defense capabilities.”

The report added that Lt. Gen. Kim Eun-ki, deputy chief of the ROK Air Force, recently appeared before a parliamentary hearing and discussed the proposed buy. A ruling party lawmaker pressed for the purchase of the F-35 instead, citing its greater stealth capabilities and claiming that its price is only 60% of the $105 million each F-15K costs.

“Right now, orders for F-35s are enormous, so it will be possible for us to buy and deploy them only after 2010,” replied Lt. Gen. Kim Eun-Ki.

In other words, the exchange doesn’t mean what the KOIS headline would lead you to believe. Leaving aside questions about the F-35’s air to air performance, even that stated 2010 deployment time is beyond optimistic. Official program timelines have the JSF system design & development phase extending to 2013, and full rate production is unlikely to begin before 2015. Even the least-risky F-35A is not going to meet the ROKAF’s needs in the 2007-2011 timeline.

As an aside, it should also be noted that buying a jet during low-rate production is also considerably more expensive. The F-35A may have a target price of around $45-50 million, but that’s to be an average over total production. Buying one during low-rate initial production has been estimated to cost $100-115 million, with the price declining rapidly once full-rate production is reached. Smaller declines tend to follow over time as full-rate production is sustained and refined.

These factors make a Phase 2 ROKAF buy of F-35A Lightning II aircraft almost inconceivable for the 2007-2011 time frame; rather than opening the issue up for consideration, Lt. Gen. Kim Eun-Ki appears to have been saying “no” in an innocuous way. Having said that, the F-35 Lightning II may still have potential as a future ROKAF platform.

Flight International reports that Seoul will decide over the next few years whether or not to buy a third batch of F-15Ks, or move forward with a separate F-X fighter program now under study. A $2 billion package of upgrades to its current fleet of Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters is also being considered.

If there is a Phase 3 buy beyond 2011, the F-35 Lightning II could be a realistic contender by then. It is unlikely to be an uncontested contender, however. The November 1, 2006 KOIS article also discusses the sentiment within Korea to diversify their defense sources – which means the F-35 would be likely to face competition from similarly-priced modernized versions of current aircraft in that price range such as the JAS-39 Gripen, Dassault Rafale (which lost to the F-15K, but has more growth upside if updates can be sustained), or even Russian/Chinese variants of the SU-30 Flanker family that have become so popular in the region (except for North Korea, who doesn’t have any).

The winner, as always, would be based on a combination of the stated requirements, how well each aircraft’s strengths and weaknesses fit those needs, standardization and support considerations, and of course the international commercial-political pressures involved.

(Original article published May 19, 2006)

Additional Readings:

  • Flight International (Aug 6/06) – F-15K crashed after pilots blacked out South Korea resumed flights with its Boeing F-15Ks on August 21 following the investigation. “The South Korean air force, which plans to enhance its biological training structure and introduce G-LOC (g-force induced loss of consciousness) training equipment…. A rash of G-LOC incidents which followed the US Air Force’s introduction of the F-15 and Lockheed Martin F-16 led to aeromedical studies that concluded the best prevention was training, particularly for pilots new to the aircraft…. The air force says the F-15K left Daegu airbase at 19:42. The aircraft discharged simulated air-to-air weapons at 20:11 but, while manoeuvring to respond to an opponent’s attack, the crew sent a “knock it off” signal at an altitude of 11,000ft (3,350m) – the aircraft crashing 16s later, at 20:12:19.”
  • Military.com Forums – F-15K/RoKAF Updates. An interesting and extensive collection of press releases (good) and republished articles (not good), covering F-15K program developments and Korean fighter program developments from March 2005 onward.
  • Republic of Korea Air Force – F-15K

Images on Defense Industry Daily

Defense Industry Daily does not own the rights to the images displayed on our site. We use images under "fair use" copyright doctrine, from public sources and private organizations, or use images under Creative Commons/ GNU licenses that make them available to the general public, or with explicit and noted permission. All rights remain with the original image owners.

If you believe that a DID image may violate these conditions, please discuss it with us via an email to editorial@defenseindustrydaily.com

The sizes displayed on DID are the only sizes we have to offer.


Close