DD (X) Destroyer Program Has Its DAB Review

For more on this and other stories, please consider purchasing a membership.
If you are already a subscriber, login to your account.
DD (X) Destroyer The USA’s DD (X) future destroyer program faces political challenges. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R-MA, Chair of the House Projection Forces Subcommittee] has openly noted that “we’re now down to a little more than a technology demonstrator platform,” and added that given its cost, a fleet of 5 ships was likely to be the end result rather than the 8-12 planned (or the 32, then 24, originally envisaged). Nevertheless, Rep. Bartlett also notes that the rise of China and US industrial base concerns are driving demand for new options of some kind. Plan B(cick for alternative view) The DD (X) program passed a recent Critical Design Review, but it is still considered one of the Navy’s most vulnerable programs. Indeed, a tug-of-war over the DD (X) is now one of the main obstacles holding up the FY 2006 defense appropriations bill. Alternatives include reactivating the USA’s Iowa Class battleships. So the present Defense Acquisition Board review is very significant to the program. Dan Dupont of Inside Defense has a very fine roundup that explains many of the political angles involved.

One Source: Hundreds of programs; Thousands of links, photos, and analyses

DII brings a complete collection of articles with original reporting and research, and expert analyses of events to your desktop – no need for multiple modules, or complex subscriptions. All supporting documents, links, & appendices accompany each article.


  • Save time
  • Eliminate your blind spots
  • Get the big picture, quickly
  • Keep up with the important facts
  • Stay on top of your projects or your competitors


  • Coverage of procurement and doctrine issues
  • Timeline of past and future program events
  • Comprehensive links to other useful resources