This article is included in these additional categories: ABM | Budgets | Issues - Political | Lobbying | New Systems Tech | Policy - Procurement | Project Management | Testing & Evaluation | Think Tanks | USA
US Missile Defense Shifting Toward More Realistic Testing?
For more on this and other stories, please consider purchasing a membership.
If you are already a subscriber, login to your account.
If you are already a subscriber, login to your account.
JS Kongo fires SM-3(click to view full) In light of a recent ballistic missile intercept by a Japanese destroyer, US Missile Defense Agency chief Lt. Gen. Henry (Trey) Obering is quoted by Aviation Week as saying it is time to incorporate more realism into the MDA’s testing process, now that basic intercepts have racked up a string of successes: “What we have to do now is to turn our attention to make sure we can fully wring out the system in a variety of operational and realistic scenarios. And that is what we will be doing over the next couple of years.” There are both technical and political dimensions to that course of action. On a technical level, one generally begins with basic tests and adds challenges only as the systems prove out in easier testing. This is simply good basic engineering. Key technical challenges that remain untested to date includes testing against some of the simpler countermeasures one might expect a nation like North Korea, Iran et. al. to deploy. Or conducting tests at night, when the Sun’s light and heat can’t intensify a re-entry vehicle’s infrared signature in space. In order to field a fully credible missile defense, […]
One Source: Hundreds of programs; Thousands of links, photos, and analyses
DII brings a complete collection of articles with original reporting and research, and expert analyses of events to your desktop – no need for multiple modules, or complex subscriptions. All supporting documents, links, & appendices accompany each article.
Benefits
- Save time
- Eliminate your blind spots
- Get the big picture, quickly
- Keep up with the important facts
- Stay on top of your projects or your competitors
Features
- Coverage of procurement and doctrine issues
- Timeline of past and future program events
- Comprehensive links to other useful resources
Monthly
$59.95/Per Month
- Charged Monthly
- 1 User
Quarterly
$50/Per Month
- $150 Charged Each Quarter
- 1 User
Yearly
$45/Per Month
- $540 charged each year
- 1 User
2 years
$35/Per Month
- $840 Charged every other year
- 1 User